Use of natural extract of chestnut (Silvafeed ENC®) in broiler feeding: effect on growth performance
Abstract and Figures
The aim of this research was to study the effect of addition of natural extract dietary tannins (饲料级单宁酸) in commercial feed on the growth of broilers. Two hundred and four broiler chicks (Cobb 508) 14 d old male, were randomly assigned to 12 floor pens and fed commercial diet supplemented with 0% (CE0), 0.15% (CE15), 0.20% (CE20) and 0.25% (CE25) of ENC. The addition of feed grade tannins showed a beneficial effect on weight increases daily feed intake (DFI) and average daily gain (ADG) from 14 to 35 days of age. In the second half of trial the effects were less evident and concluding with a detrimental effect in CE25 group. Feed conversion rate (FCR) appears to be statistically different in the second and fifth weeks of feeding. The inclusion of ENC at 0.20%, (CE20) had significant influences on final weight, DFI and ADG and a favourable influence on FCR in comparison with the other three groups. In conclusion, dietary tannins (饲料级单宁酸) has been shown to be beneficial at concentrations between 0.15% and 0.20%.
Use of natural extract of chestnut (Silvafeed ENC®) in broiler feeding: effect on growth performance
- Schiavone1, K. Guo2, S. Tassone2, L. Gasco2,
- Malfatto2, I. Zoccarato2
1 Dipartimento di Produzioni Animali, Epidemiologia e Ecologia. Università di Torino, Italy.
2 Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche. Università di Torino, Italy
Corresponding author: Kaijun Guo, Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche, Università di Torino, Via L. da Vinci 44, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy – Tel. +39 011 6708568 – Fax: +39 011 6708563 – Email: guo.kaijun@unito.it
ABSTRACT – The aim of this research was to study the effect of addition of natural extract of chestnut (Castanea sativa) Silvafeed ENC® in commercial feed on the growth of broilers. Two hundred and four broiler chicks (Cobb 508) 14 d old male, were randomly assigned to 12 floor pens and fed commercial diet supplement- ed with 0% (CE0), 0.15% (CE15), 0.20% (CE20) and 0.25% (CE25) of ENC. The ENC addition showed a benefi- cial effect on weight increases daily feed intake (DFI) and average daily gain (ADG) from 14 to 35 days of age. In the second half of trial the effects were less evident and concluding with a detrimental effect in CE25 group. Feed conversion rate (FCR) appears to be statistically different in the second and fifth weeks of feeding. The inclusion of ENC at 0.20%, (CE20) had significant influences on final weight, DFI and ADG and a favourable influence on FCR in comparison with the other three groups. In conclusion, ENC has been shown to be benefi- cial at concentrations between 0.15% and 0.20%.
Key words: Hydrolysable tannin, Silvafeed ENC, Broilers, Growth performance.
INTRODUCTION – In 2006, the EU banned the use of antibiotic growth promoters (AGP) in animal feeding. Many approaches have been proposed in order to replace the AGP and to maximise performance and economic viabili- ty. The hydrolysable tannins appear interesting (Graziani et al. 2006). From a nutritionist’s view point, tannins in ani- mal feeds are a double-edged sword. For a long time, tannins have been considered as antinutritional factors reducing digestibility of crude protein and consequently growth performances in monogastric animals (Mueller-Harvey, 2006) while in ruminant nutrition, the results appear more positive (Mueller-Harvey, 2006; Tabacco et al., 2006). Moreover, tannins have shown anthelmintic properties in ruminants (Min and Hart, 2003) and in birds (Marzoni et al., 2005). In our previous findings (Schiavone et al., 2006) we observed that Silvafeed ENC in broiler feed did not influence the in vivo digestibility. The aim of this trial was to study the growth performance of broilers fed with different doses of ENC.
MATERIAL AND METHODS – Two hundred and four 1 day-old male Cobb 508 broiler chicks were housed in a standard broiler house and fed ad libitum. In the first two weeks, the heating was provided to keep the room tem- perature in accordance with standard brooding practices. The trial lasted for 42 days from 14 to 56 d of age. On the 14th day, the chicks were weighed and randomly divided into 12 groups of 17 chicks each. Each group was assigned to a floor pen (1.7 m2) furnished with rice hulls and wood chip (50:50 w/w) as litter. A commercial diet (ME: 12.34 MJ/kg; crude protein: 20%) was supplemented with 0% (CE0), 0.15% (CE15), 0.20% (CE20) and 0.25% (CE25) of ENC. The diets were assigned to 12 pens according to latin square design. Each chick was identified by wing mark and every week, individual body weight and feed consumption per pen were recorded. Mortality was recorded daily. At the end of the cycle, individual average daily gain (ADG), daily feed intake (DFI), and feed conversion rate (FCR), on a flock basis, were calculated. Data were statistically analysed with ANOVA of SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
ITAL.J.ANIM.SCI. VOL. 6 (SUPPL. 1), 731-733, 2007 731
PROC. 17th NAT. CONGR. ASPA, ALGHERO, ITALY
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS – The weights, DFI, ADG and FCR measured at different ages are shown in figure 1. The addition of ENC showed a positive effect on weight increases in the first three weeks; growth was directly proportional to the concentration of ENC. From the 42nd to 49th day of age the favorable trend showed by ENC was maintained, but the differences were not significant.
On the 56th day CE20 group showed a significant higher weight than CE25 (Fig.1). In the first three weeks, irrespectively to ENC concentration, DFI was higher in the treatment groups than in the control; whereas from day 42 to day 56 the DFI showed a slowing down more evident in the group CE25 than the control, CE15 and CE20 groups; from day 49 to 56 the DFI in CE25 was significantly lower than the other groups.
Similarly, ENC had favorable influences on ADG in the first two weeks, especially for CE20 and CE25, while the effect in CE25 was drastically reversed in the last two weeks.
The effects on FCR were significant only from day 21 to day 28 and from day 42 to 49; during the second week group CE20 showed a more favorable FCR while, due to the reduction of ADG, in the fifth week CE25 showed an unfavorable rate.
Figure 1. Trends of broiler’s weights, daily feed intakes, average daily gains and FCR.
A, B, C=P<0.01; a, b, c= P<0.05.
As a whole trial, CE20 had significantly positive effects on final weight, DFI and ADG (table 1). Favorable effects were evident also on FCR even though the differences among the four groups were not significant; CE15 and CE20, showed significant differences on DFI in comparison with CE0 and CE25. The highest final weight and more favorable FCR showed in CE20 group could be explained by the positive trend of digestibility observed in our previous study (Schiavone et al., 2006) and by the fact that ENC could modify the stability of the gastrointestinal microflora improv- ing the competitive exclusion similarly to others plant extracts (de Lange, 2005). In fact, as observed by Li and Song (2004) and Graziani et al., (2006), chestnut natural extract, has antimicrobial effects on different bacterial strains as E.coli, B.subtilis or S.enteriditis and C. Perfirigens type A. In this trial, the observed FCR were better than the results of Diao and Qi (1999) which ranged from 2.20-2.24 within 0-8 weeks old of broilers and higher than those reviewed by
732 ITAL.J.ANIM.SCI. VOL. 6 (SUPPL. 1), 731-733, 2007
PROC. 17th NAT. CONGR. ASPA, ALGHERO, ITALY
de Lange (2005). In conclusion, the broilers in this study showed an acceptable growth performance and the supple- mentation of ENC up to 0.20% appeared to be safety and allowed a beneficial effect on productive traits. Nevertheless, more research is necessary to understand the action of ENC at gastrointestinal tract level.
Table 1. Growth performances of broilers from 14 to 56 d of age.
Group | CE0 | CE15 | CE20 | CE25 | SE |
Number | 51 | 51 | 51 | 51 | |
Initial weight | 263.70 | 266.60 | 274.61 | 272.65 | 2.54 |
Final weight | 2967.11ab | 3024.65ab | 3144.70b | 2881.46a | 25.78 |
DFI* | 128.91A | 134.92B | 132.28B | 128.96A | 0.44 |
ADG* | 64.22ab | 65.58ab | 68.28b | 62.40a | 0.58 |
FRC* | 2.02 | 2.09 | 1.96 | 2.10 | 0.02 |
Means with different letters in the same row differ significantly.
A, B=P<0.01; a, b= P<0.05.
*DFI: daily feed intake; ADG: average daily gain; FRC: feed conversion ratio.
A special thanks to Mrs Daniela Laurino and Mrs Emily Joseph for birds care and technical support. The research was supported by SilvaTeam S.r.l. – San Michele di Mondovì (Cuneo) Italy.
REFERENCES – de Lange, L., 2005. Nutribiotics could replace antibiotics in feed. World Poult.21(10): 26-
- Diao, Q., Qi, G., 1999. Tannins in livestock feed in China. Proceedings of International Workshop on tan- nins in livestock and human nutrition. Adelaide, Australia, 31 May-2 June, 1999. p 66-70. Graziani, R., Tosi, G., Denti R. 2006. In vitro antimicrobial activity of Silvafeed ENC® on bacterial strains of poultry origin. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 62 (suppl.):12th European Poultry Conference. Verona. Italy. Paper 10859. Li, Y., Song G., 2004. Study on bacteriostasis of chestnut shell extract. Chemistry and Industry of Forest Products, 24(4):61- 64 (in chinese). Marzoni, M., Castillo, A. Romboli, I., 2005. Dietary inclusion of Quebracho (Schopsis lorentzii) tannins on productive performances of growing pheasant females. Ita. J. Anim. Sci. 4(2): 507-509. Min, B.R., Hart, S.P., 2003. Tannins for suppression of internal parasites. J. Anim. Sci. 81 (E. Suppl. 2): E102-E109. Mueller-Hervey, I., 2006. Unravelling the conundrum of tannins in animal nutrition and health. J. Sci. Food Agric., 86: 2010-2037. Schiavone, A., Tassone, S., Guo, K., Perona, G., Gasco, L., Zoccarato, I., 2006. Dietary administration of chestnut extract in chicken broilers. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 62 (suppl.):12th European Poultry Conference. Verona. Italy. Paper 10856. Tabacco, E., Borreani, G., Crovetto, G.M., Galassi, G., Colombo, D., Cavallarin, L., 2006. Effect of chesnut tannin on fermentation quality, proteolysis and protein rumen degradability of alfalfa silage. J. Dairy Sci., 89: 4736-4746.
ITAL.J.ANIM.SCI. VOL. 6 (SUPPL. 1), 731-733, 2007
Use-of-Dietary-Tannins-in-broiler-feeding-effect